Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wind Mill Pump"

From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
 
Line 19: Line 19:
Is the eccentricity of part 3.1 sufficient for the stroke of this diaphragm pump?
Is the eccentricity of part 3.1 sufficient for the stroke of this diaphragm pump?


== Part number B -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 20:28, 12 January 2022 (CET) ==
== Part number B -- [[User:Dmosquera1968|Dmosquera1968]] ([[User talk:Dmosquera1968|talk]]) 00:00, 12 January 2022 (CET) ==


It is recommended to include a visual representation of the non-return valves (parts 4.8 and 4.9).
It is recommended to include a visual representation of the non-return valves (parts 4.8 and 4.9).

Latest revision as of 21:28, 12 January 2022

Part number B -- Jeefri (talk) 18:34, 4 January 2022 (CET)

POS 2.1 and 2.2 change to Production type.

Part number 2 -- Dmosquera1968 (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2022 (CET)

Could add technical notes on installation and maintenance of the structure.

-- Jaimerosciano (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2022 (CET)

  • Add the quantities of each part in the corresponding drawing.
  • Add technical notes where shown:
  • . Concrete base to obtain a firmer hold and minimize oscillations.
  • . Sand and coat metal parts with corrosion protection paint.
  • . Lubricate the rotating elements with water and dust resistant grease.

Part number 4 -- Dmosquera1968 (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2022 (CET)

Is the eccentricity of part 3.1 sufficient for the stroke of this diaphragm pump?

Part number B -- Dmosquera1968 (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2022 (CET)

It is recommended to include a visual representation of the non-return valves (parts 4.8 and 4.9).

OPEN HARDWARE OBSERVATORY 2020
| |
|||