Difference between revisions of "Talk:Small water turbine"
(→Part number 6.2 -- ~~~~: new section) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Part number B -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 03:06, 3 March 2021 (CET) == | == Part number B -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 03:06, 3 March 2021 (CET) == | ||
Knowledge of the material of the parts, especially metal parts, is required for their construction | Knowledge of the material of the parts, especially metal parts, is required for their construction. | ||
== Part number 3.3 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 03:10, 3 March 2021 (CET) == | == Part number 3.3 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 03:10, 3 March 2021 (CET) == |
Revision as of 02:14, 4 March 2021
Part number 1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2021 (CET)
this pdf drawing is missing
Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:06, 3 March 2021 (CET)
Knowledge of the material of the parts, especially metal parts, is required for their construction.
Part number 3.3 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:10, 3 March 2021 (CET)
What is the thickness of this part?
Re: Part number 3.3 -- Inddigital (talk) 01:02, 4 March 2021 (CET)
- Hi xtech, your comment has been resolved, please remove the Action Required check mark.
Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2021 (CET)
it is recommended to indicate DIN references for fasteners parts
-- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2021 (CET)
It is suggested to include some theoretical estimates of equipment capacity and efficiency.
Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2021 (CET)
- you can get a complete theoretical analysis at: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/27493
Among others, some characteristic curves of the equipment are shown, like this one:
Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2021 (CET)
In some items it says cap machine, I think it is a mistake.
Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2021 (CET)
the Sheet and Qty columns must be updated
Part number 11.3 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:57, 3 March 2021 (CET)
Specifications of this Standard part are missing
Part number 11.5 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2021 (CET)
Specifications of this Standard part are missing
Part number 5 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:19, 3 March 2021 (CET)
For sliding fit moving parts, it is highly recommended to place dimensional tolerances on the dimensions where applicable. In the absence of this, a general value could be specified for these dimensions
Re: Part number 5 -- Inddigital (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2021 (CET)
- Thanks for your suggestion, a new thread has been opened in general comments, to highlight this point.
Part number 3 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2021 (CET)
test
Part number 7.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2021 (CET)
this piece does not appear to correspond to any of the original design, it should be removed.
-- Inddigital (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2021 (CET)
In cases of sliding parts, use 0.2 mm as tolerance for diametrical dimensions.
Part number 6.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2021 (CET)
this pdf drawing is missing