Difference between revisions of "Talk:Small water turbine"

From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
Line 61: Line 61:


this piece does not appear to correspond to any of the original design, it should be removed.
this piece does not appear to correspond to any of the original design, it should be removed.
===Re: Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 03:26, 4 March 2021 (CET)===
: Replace this text with your reply


==  -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 01:06, 4 March 2021 (CET) ==
==  -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 01:06, 4 March 2021 (CET) ==

Revision as of 04:26, 4 March 2021

Part number 1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2021 (CET)

this pdf drawing is missing

Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:06, 3 March 2021 (CET)

Knowledge of the material of the parts, especially metal parts, is required for their construction.

Part number 3.3 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:10, 3 March 2021 (CET)

What is the thickness of this part?

Re: Part number 3.3 -- Inddigital (talk) 01:02, 4 March 2021 (CET)

Hi xtech, your comment has been resolved, please remove the Action Required check mark.

Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2021 (CET)

it is recommended to indicate DIN references for fasteners parts

-- Xtech2020 review (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2021 (CET)

It is suggested to include some theoretical estimates of equipment capacity and efficiency.

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2021 (CET)

you can get a complete theoretical analysis at: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/27493

Among others, some characteristic curves of the equipment are shown, like this one:

Oseg swt curves1.jpg

Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2021 (CET)

In some items it says cap machine, I think it is a mistake.

Part number B -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2021 (CET)

the Sheet and Qty columns must be updated

Part number 11.3 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:57, 3 March 2021 (CET)

Specifications of this Standard part are missing

Part number 11.5 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2021 (CET)

Specifications of this Standard part are missing

Part number 5 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:19, 3 March 2021 (CET)

For sliding fit moving parts, it is highly recommended to place dimensional tolerances on the dimensions where applicable. In the absence of this, a general value could be specified for these dimensions

Re: Part number 5 -- Inddigital (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2021 (CET)

Thanks for your suggestion, a new thread has been opened in general comments, to highlight this point.

-- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2021 (CET)

Great

Part number 7.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2021 (CET)

this piece does not appear to correspond to any of the original design, it should be removed.

Re: Part number 7.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2021 (CET)

Replace this text with your reply

-- Inddigital (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2021 (CET)

In cases of sliding parts, use 0.2 mm as tolerance for diametrical dimensions.

Part number 6.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2021 (CET)

this pdf drawing is missing

Part number B -- Inddigital (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2021 (CET)

Here, some of the required updates, I will post the rest as soon as possible. Regarding the DIN code for the screws, I will try to keep it as it is, since they are references under American standard with DIN and ISO equivalents easily found.

Part number 2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2021 (CET)

this pdf drawing is missing

OPEN HARDWARE OBSERVATORY 2020
| |
|||