Talk:Pipe Bending Machine
Part number 3.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
The vertical dimension of the part is missing
Part number 3.1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
Structural steel parts are preferred in A36
Re: Part number 3.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- Done
Part number 2.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
- The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
- Structural steel parts are preferred in A36
Re: Part number 2.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- All resolved
Part number B1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
Include production parts material in specification column
-- Thehunter (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
please change license to CC-BY-SA 4.0
Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- Done
-- Thehunter (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
please ad some recomendations for surface treatment
Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added
-- Thehunter (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation
Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added
Part number 3.5 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
Part number 4.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
Part number 7.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?
-- Thehunter (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?
Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
- Yes, it is at the manufacturer's discretion to include variants of this part to expand the capacity of the equipment.
Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
Here the quantity must be two and not one
Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?
Part number 7.3 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this
Part number 7.4 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST)
that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)