Talk:Corn mill

Part number 0 -- Pomelo (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2020 (CEST)

Some part names were changed and others were added. These names are of common use and have a good degree of specificity.

-- Consu (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2020 (CEST)

HOLA TEST--Consu (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2020 (CEST)

Part number 4.8 -- Consu (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2020 (CEST)

HELLO WORLD

Re: Part number 4.8 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Hi!

Part number 1 -- Pomelo (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2020 (CEST)

Item numbers have to be swapped to match the names of the individual drawings.

Re: Part number 1 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Done!

Part number 1.2 -- Pomelo (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2020 (CEST)

Avoid specifying tolerances unless you are handling with elements that do need them. For example bearings, pins and axles do need them. There are different tolerances standards. I attached a PDF with general tolerances under DIN - ISO for future reference. The file has gone through ocr so one could select the text to translate.

To the extent of what is possible, avoid using decimals smaller than 0.5 unless strictly necessary. The average DIY/Maker does not have a ruler with partitions smaller than a 1 mm and generally uses a marker that is as thick. And the device itself does not need that level of accuracy for most part.

Re: Part number 1.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Excellent observation, in any case, the values in parentheses are equivalent in inches, not tolerances.

Part number 1.1 -- Pomelo (talk) 22:00, 11 September 2020 (CEST)

This is not a symmetric part which means that a reference edge is needed to refer all the measurements to. The reference edge can be placed on either end of the part.

The 8.5mm holes look more like 6.5mm in the PDF with the screenshots. Less variation in the hardware components simplify the construction. A single zinc coated M6 bolt with a strength class of 5.8 (DIN EN ISO 898-1), which is the lowest class, can hold 800 kg of weight before it stretches and 1000 kg before it breaks.

Re: Part number 1.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Thank you, good input for an improved version.

Part number 3 -- Fvillada (talk) 14:47, 14 September 2020 (CEST)

Can you please add the two dimension (width) in the pulley disc. Also will be great if you add the information or reference of the twos belts.

Re: Part number 3 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

The pulley width is shown in item 3.8. Regarding the belts, this depends on the motor you are going to use, which I do not contemplate in this development, I will take it into account for an improved version.

Part number 2 -- Fvillada (talk) 12:20, 15 September 2020 (CEST)

The numbering from Lower Funnel 1 and Lower Funnel 2 is missing from the drawing

Re: Part number 2 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 2.1 -- Fvillada (talk) 12:31, 15 September 2020 (CEST)

correct the handwriting form ANSI (L 1 x 1 x 1_8) to ANSI(L 1x1x1/8)

Re: Part number 2.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

They are automatic names of the CAD system, where I cannot place certain characters.

Part number 2.3 -- Fvillada (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2020 (CEST)

correct the handwriting form ANSI (L 1 x 1 x 1_8) to ANSI(L 1x1x1/8). Also the code of product do not macht with the code in the part list

Re: Part number 2.3 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

They are automatic names of the CAD system, where I can't place certain characters in a quick way.

Part number 2.4 -- Fvillada (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2020 (CEST)

correct the handwriting form ANSI (L 1 x 1 x 1_8) to ANSI(L 1x1x1/8). Also the code of product do not macht with the code in the part list

Re: Part number 2.4 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

They are automatic names of the CAD system, where I can't place certain characters in a quick way.

Part number 0 -- Aquilesmorillo (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2020 (CET)

For manufacturing processes in applications that do not require greater precision, you can use measurements in millimeters, without decimals (applies to all items).

Re: Part number 0 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

A decimal was used to facilitate some angled cuts and on certain parts with sliding adjustment

Part number 1.1 -- Aquilesmorillo (talk) 20:22, 5 November 2020 (CET)

You can size the hole centers from the ends of the piece

Re: Part number 1.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 17:51, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Done!

Part number 4 -- Aquilesmorillo (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2020 (CET)

This piece and similar could be manufactured with bent sheet metal

Re: Part number 4 -- Inddigital (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Ok, I will keep this in mind for an improved version.

-- Aquilesmorillo (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2020 (CET)

Hello, it would be interesting to develop the project to use a multipurpose electric motor of 110 V and 1/4 HP.

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

The original video works with a diesel engine, but the idea of using an electric motor is very appropriate and could be applied in an improved version of the equipment.