Instructions for Reviewers
From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
Revision as of 04:37, 9 March 2021 by Inddigital (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The Reviewers have the task to technically analyse all the Project documentation, for which, they must have gone through the #sing-up|re...")
The Reviewers have the task to technically analyse all the Project documentation, for which, they must have gone through the registration process in the same way as for the Applicant. It must also have the role of certificarion_reviewer, as indicated in Reviewer designation.
Each Reviewer must comply with the aspects mentioned below:
Analysis of Technical Documentation
- Enter the project page.
- Analyse all available information, especially the assembly instructions, which includes:
- Correct references between parts in the Technical drawings and the Parts list .
- Well explained manufacturing processes for special parts or joining means.
- Consistency in the information shown, it must make sense in technical and [Open Hardware] terms.
Release of non-conformities
On the project page, comments on technical aspects can be made, these comments are the channel in which non-conformities are issued.
A comment or non-conformity must be issued in the following cases:
- Information is missing in order to be able to classify or recognise a part or assembly.
- Information about a supplier is missing (links to websites tend to be modified).
- Missing information on a purchased part, in order to be able to locate it in current markets.
- Missing measurements or other specifications in the Technical drawings.
- Lack of coherence in the specifications, with respect to the assembly of the parts.
- Missing fields in the Parts list.
- Depending on the type of assembly:
- There must exist for each part, a plan in PDF and its respective CAD file (the latter, with the purpose of being able to review the 3D information in other CAD systems different from the one that has generated the parts).
- The 3D printing parts must be accompanied by their STL file, in addition to their PDF drawing and their CAD file.
- For printed circuit boards (PCB), the addresses of their components must be included.
- In case of confusing information or obvious mistakes, a friendly comment should be left, pointing out the mistake in the corresponding item.
- In case of problems regarding the Project in general, there is an extra field in the Parts list, where comments can be added
- Those items that require some correction by the Applicant, must be marked as Action required, in the Project page, action Edit, tab Part list.
- This process can be repeated as long as there are comments or non-conformities with corrections to be made and not all the items of the Part list are approved, through which, communication with the Applicant must always be maintained.
Project Approval
After all non-conformities have been resolved, you should:
- Mark each item in the Part list as Approved, on the Project page, action Edit, tab Part list.
- Add a final comment including OK, FINISHED.
- Notify the Coordinator, about the Project Approval.