Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pipe Bending Machine"

From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


The vertical dimension of the part is missing
The vertical dimension of the part is missing
===Re: Part number 3.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


== Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
===Re: Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


== Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
Line 11: Line 19:
* The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
* The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
* Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
* Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
===Re: Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: All resolved


== Part number B1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number B1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


Include production parts material in specification column
Include production parts material in specification column
===Re: Part number B1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:27, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
Line 35: Line 51:


please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation
please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added


== Part number 3.5 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 3.5 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
===Re: Part number 3.5 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation


== Part number 4.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 4.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
===Re: Part number 4.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation


== Part number 7.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 7.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?
is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?
===Re: Part number 7.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, all of these perforations are at the same distance from the center, 75 mm.


==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?
because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, it is at the manufacturer's discretion to include variants of this part to expand the capacity of the equipment.


== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


Here the quantity must be two and not one
Here the quantity must be two and not one
===Re: Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?
the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?
===Re: Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Corrected


== Part number 7.3 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 7.3 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this
I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this
===Re: Part number 7.3 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:25, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Ok, will be taken into account for an improved version


== Part number 7.4 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 7.4 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)
that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)
===Re: Part number 7.4 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: True, this needs to be improved.

Latest revision as of 12:27, 9 April 2021

Part number 3.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

The vertical dimension of the part is missing

Re: Part number 3.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 3.1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Structural steel parts are preferred in A36

Re: Part number 3.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 2.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

  • The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
  • Structural steel parts are preferred in A36

Re: Part number 2.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

All resolved

Part number B1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Include production parts material in specification column

Re: Part number B1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

-- Thehunter (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please change license to CC-BY-SA 4.0

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

-- Thehunter (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please ad some recomendations for surface treatment

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added

-- Thehunter (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added

Part number 3.5 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

has the C45 material a sufficient service life?

Re: Part number 3.5 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation

Part number 4.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

has the C45 material a sufficient service life?

Re: Part number 4.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation

Part number 7.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?

Re: Part number 7.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, all of these perforations are at the same distance from the center, 75 mm.

-- Thehunter (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, it is at the manufacturer's discretion to include variants of this part to expand the capacity of the equipment.

Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Here the quantity must be two and not one

Re: Part number 7.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?

Re: Part number 7.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Corrected

Part number 7.3 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this

Re: Part number 7.3 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Ok, will be taken into account for an improved version

Part number 7.4 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)

Re: Part number 7.4 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

True, this needs to be improved.
OPEN HARDWARE OBSERVATORY 2020
| |
|||