Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pipe Bending Machine"

From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


The vertical dimension of the part is missing
The vertical dimension of the part is missing
===Re: Part number 3.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


== Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==


Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
===Re: Part number 3.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done


== Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
== Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
Line 11: Line 19:
* The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
* The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
* Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
* Structural steel parts are preferred in [https://en.oho.wiki/wiki/Parts_list#materials A36]
===Re: Part number 2.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: All resolved
== Part number B1 -- [[User:Xtech2020 review|Xtech2020 review]] ([[User talk:Xtech2020 review|talk]]) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
Include production parts material in specification column
===Re: Part number B1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:27, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
please change license to CC-BY-SA 4.0
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:14, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 09:58, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
please ad some recomendations for surface treatment
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added
== Part number 3.5 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
===Re: Part number 3.5 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation
== Part number 4.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
has the C45 material a sufficient service life?
===Re: Part number 4.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation
== Part number 7.1 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?
===Re: Part number 7.1 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, all of these perforations are at the same distance from the center, 75 mm.
==  -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?
===Re: -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Yes, it is at the manufacturer's discretion to include variants of this part to expand the capacity of the equipment.
== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
Here the quantity must be two and not one
===Re: Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Done
== Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?
===Re: Part number 7.2 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Corrected
== Part number 7.3 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this
===Re: Part number 7.3 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:25, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: Ok, will be taken into account for an improved version
== Part number 7.4 -- [[User:Thehunter|Thehunter]] ([[User talk:Thehunter|talk]]) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST) ==
that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)
===Re: Part number 7.4 -- [[User:Inddigital|Inddigital]] ([[User talk:Inddigital|talk]]) 13:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)===
: True, this needs to be improved.

Latest revision as of 12:27, 9 April 2021

Part number 3.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

The vertical dimension of the part is missing

Re: Part number 3.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 3.1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:17, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Structural steel parts are preferred in A36

Re: Part number 3.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 2.2 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:20, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

  • The horizontal dimension of the part is missing
  • Structural steel parts are preferred in A36

Re: Part number 2.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

All resolved

Part number B1 -- Xtech2020 review (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Include production parts material in specification column

Re: Part number B1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

-- Thehunter (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please change license to CC-BY-SA 4.0

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

-- Thehunter (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please ad some recomendations for surface treatment

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added

-- Thehunter (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

please add a few notes on maintenance, for example lubricate the blades regularly to avoids oxidation

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done, in an improved version, a page for technical notes will be added

Part number 3.5 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

has the C45 material a sufficient service life?

Re: Part number 3.5 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation

Part number 4.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

has the C45 material a sufficient service life?

Re: Part number 4.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, with a quenching and tempering heat treatment a hardness of about 55HRC can be achieved, which provides wear resistance and extends service life, I have added the annotation

Part number 7.1 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

is it correct that all holes have the same distance of 75 mm from the central point?

Re: Part number 7.1 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, all of these perforations are at the same distance from the center, 75 mm.

-- Thehunter (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

because of the thickness of the component 7.1 I assume that the maximum tube diameter is 20 mm, is that correct?

Re: -- Inddigital (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Yes, it is at the manufacturer's discretion to include variants of this part to expand the capacity of the equipment.

Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

Here the quantity must be two and not one

Re: Part number 7.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Done

Part number 7.2 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

the total thickness of the hair iron disc is given as 10 mm, what is the thickness on the beveled side?

Re: Part number 7.2 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Corrected

Part number 7.3 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

I think here you can find on standard parts, but it is ok like this

Re: Part number 7.3 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

Ok, will be taken into account for an improved version

Part number 7.4 -- Thehunter (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2021 (CEST)

that must be a very good mechanic who gets exactly 191.77 mm distance between the two hole centers :-)

Re: Part number 7.4 -- Inddigital (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)

True, this needs to be improved.
OPEN HARDWARE OBSERVATORY 2020
| |
|||