Talk:Cosi measure new

From OHO - search engine for sustainable open hardware projects
Revision as of 05:41, 11 July 2020 by Djaeger (talk | contribs)

Part number 5.2.5 -- Micha (Diskussion) 20:50, 8. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Test

Part number 1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:16, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Is there an assembly instruction/drawing somewhere?

Part number 1.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

part number is a duplicate

Part number 1.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:27, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642 (2020-02-00)

Part number 1.10 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.16 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:38, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

nominal length missing

Part number 1.17 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:39, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.18 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:45, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:46, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.20 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:47, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 10642

Part number 1.21 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:50, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 1.23 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:51, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

not a standard part

Part number 1.24 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:52, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4762 (2004-06-00)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:53, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part :)

Part number 1.25 -- Martin (Diskussion) 18:54, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

BTW super obsolete screw standard :) The current one is DIN EN ISO 4032 (2013-04-00)

Part number 2.1 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:10, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

  • avoid "chain dimensioning" and refer to and a reference point/edge so measure tolerances don't add up when making these holes
  • hole positions are a little confusing :)
  • no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.2 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:18, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective; just some comments:

  • dividing line between both rectangle parts makes no sense
  • a note that all holes are ø5,5mm would be sufficient (BTW one in the lower row of holes is technically not defined :) )
  • cross out "optional", technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)
  • no tolerance class defined (I suggest "m" according to DIN ISO 2768-1), but also not crucial for this piece of hardware

Part number 2.3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:24, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Approved from my perspective, but please clarify, that these ø16mm circles missing are the the countersinks (which weren't defined in 2.1 or 2.2)

& define what kind of countersink you mean (I assume 16x90°)

--

Nice tutorial for referencing holes/threads etc. (after US standards): https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/mindworks/Solidworks/Topic%20References/DrawingGuidelines.pdf

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:31, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

width of the small rectangle is missing (I assume it's 40mm)

Part number 2.5 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:34, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

just some comments:

  • please clarify countersinks; ø12mm circles can be omitted when you reference them e.g. like 12x90°) (see these pictures as example)
  • detailed view is unnecessary
  • dividing line between both rectangles makes no sense

Part number 2.7 -- Martin (Diskussion) 19:58, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

thread of left hole is undefined (for now it's just a hole)

→ omit the detail view and reference the holes with M5 x 20mm

Part number 2.8 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:00, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 2.9 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:01, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

approved from my perspective, but please remove the optional part, technical drawings are there to create exact replicates of a thing (within the defined tolerances)

Part number 3 -- Martin (Diskussion) 20:03, 15. Mai 2020 (CEST)

all "PDFs" link to STL files :)

Part number 5.4.29 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:37, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 5.4.19 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:39, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 5.4.13 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:40, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

that's a standard part

Part number 3.9 -- Martin (Diskussion) 21:41, 16. Mai 2020 (CEST)

Export file missing

Re: Part number 3.9 -- Micha (Diskussion) 11:28, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

stl file missing but can be produced from step file

Part number 5.0.1 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:12, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the assembly file need more details about the connection between the limit switches and power management board and BeBoPr++ ,(pin to pin connection ) specially from power management board to BeBoPr++ .

Part number 5.1.5 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:23, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

need more information for how to buy

Part number 5.1.6 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:27, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the link is not working

Part number 5.1.12 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:37, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

need more information for search and buy in internet.

Part number 5.1.15 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:42, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.16 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.17 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.1.18 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 18:43, 24. Mai 2020 (CEST)

quantity is missing

Part number 5.2.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 17:36, 25. Mai 2020 (CEST)

for test

Part number 5.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 17:36, 25. Mai 2020 (CEST)

for test

Part number 5.2.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:11, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the information for buying this item is not enough .(package , size , ...)

Part number 5.2.9 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:18, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

the info for buy from in internet is not enough . (name)

Part number 5.4.2 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:50, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 5.4.4 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:52, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 5.4.5 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:53, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

link is not working

Part number 5.4.6 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 22:54, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 5.4.10 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 23:00, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 5.4.11 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 23:00, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 5.4.27 -- Mehrdad (Diskussion) 23:07, 30. Mai 2020 (CEST)

this item need more info for finding in internet

Part number 2.1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:32, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

Should be possible to produce according to the drawing, but it's far away from a standardised one.

  • Should use symmetry of the component
  • clear decimal places which are not needed
  • Make dimensioning suitable for production
  • Dimensioning of holes, clearence holes and sinks has to be adapted to the respective standards
  • Absence of tolerence
  • Clear all "mm" in dimensioning. Mechanical technical drawings always use mm as unit, except declared different

Part number 2.1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:33, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

.stp file missing.

Part number 2.2 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:37, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

  • Drawing inadequate, see comment on part 2.1
  • stp file missing

Part number 2.3 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:47, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

  • clear decimal places which are not needed
  • Make dimensioning suitable for production
  • Dimensioning of holes, clearence holes and sinks has to be adapted to the respective standards
  • Absence of tolerence
  • Clear all "mm" in dimensioning. Mechanical technical drawings always use mm as unit, except declared different
  • .stp file missing

Part number 2.4 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:49, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

  • clear decimal places which are not needed
  • Make dimensioning suitable for production
  • Dimensioning of holes, clearence holes and sinks has to be adapted to the respective standards
  • Absence of tolerence
  • Clear all "mm" in dimensioning. Mechanical technical drawings always use mm as unit, except declared different
  • stp file missing

Part number 2.5 -- Micha (Diskussion) 15:57, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

  • Should use symmetry of the component
  • clear decimal places which are not needed
  • Make dimensioning suitable for production
  • Dimensioning of holes, clearence holes and sinks has to be adapted to the respective standards
  • Absence of tolerence
  • Clear all "mm" in dimensioning. Mechanical technical drawings always use mm as unit, except declared different
  • stp file missing

Part number 0 -- Micha (Diskussion) 16:01, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

With respect to the technical drawings of all plates(part numbers 2.%) Should be possible to produce according to the drawings, but it's far away from a standardised one.

  • Should use symmetry of the component
  • clear decimal places which are not needed
  • Make dimensioning suitable for production
  • Dimensioning of holes, clearence holes and sinks has to be adapted to the respective standards
  • Absence of tolerence
  • Clear all "mm" in dimensioning. Mechanical technical drawings always use mm as unit, except declared different
  • stp files missing

Part number 1 -- Micha (Diskussion) 16:08, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

Agree, assembly instructions are missing. But there were some in the old project.

Part number 1.6 -- Micha (Diskussion) 16:21, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

Dimensions are unclear.

Part number 1.12 -- Micha (Diskussion) 16:31, 2. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

link refers to a spindle with 642 mm length.

Part number 1.16 -- Micha (Diskussion) 10:49, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

  • nominal length missing
  • meaningless description

Part number 1.22 -- Micha (Diskussion) 11:02, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

Simple part could also be produced if not available in shop. For this dimensions could be useful

Part number 1.23 -- Micha (Diskussion) 11:04, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

could also be assigned to production (if dimensions were given)

Part number 1.26 -- Micha (Diskussion) 11:14, 8. Jun. 2020 (CEST)

Manufacturer independent description missing. When the link dies, this part is irreproducible. If there does not exist any independent description, technical drawing for production matters will be needed.

OPEN HARDWARE OBSERVATORY 2020
| |
|||